From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyra v. Jacobellis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-01-2017

In the Matter of Marek HYRA, appellant, v. Thomas J. JACOBELLIS, etc., et al., respondents.

Marek Hyra, Mahopac, NY, appellant pro se. Costello & Folchetti, Carmel, NY (Gregory L. Folchetti of counsel), for respondents.


Marek Hyra, Mahopac, NY, appellant pro se.

Costello & Folchetti, Carmel, NY (Gregory L. Folchetti of counsel), for respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Thomas Jacobellis of the Town of Carmel Justice Court to reinstate certain charges formerly pending in that Court, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated December 27, 2013, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petition was properly denied, and the proceeding was properly dismissed, as barred by the four-month statute of limitations applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings (see CPLR 217[1] ; Matter of

Holtzman v. Marrus, 74 N.Y.2d 865, 547 N.Y.S.2d 829, 547 N.E.2d 84 ).

ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hyra v. Jacobellis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Hyra v. Jacobellis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marek HYRA, appellant, v. Thomas J. JACOBELLIS, etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 1, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 710