From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF

01-13-2014

HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, v. PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE FERENBACH

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered December 17, 2013.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by January 3, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED to the extent that it is not inconsisten with this Order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the permanent injunction and attorneys' fees are GRANTED as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED consistent with this Order.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

__________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United/States District Court

Exhibit 1

HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, vs. PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al., Defendants.

2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF


DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AND

PERMANENT INJUCTION ORDER

This action having been commenced by Plaintiff Hypertherm, Inc. ("Hypertherm") against Defendants WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants") for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 for the reason that Defendants are making, selling, offering to sell, or using products infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,946,617; 8,115,136; 8,212,173; 7,829,816; and 6,207,923 (collectively, the "Hypertherm Asserted Patents"), which are owned and controlled by Hypertherm; and

Defendants having been properly served through personal delivery ofthe Summons in a Civil Action, Civil Cover Sheet and Complaint upon an authorized agent of Defendants; and

None of the Defendants having filed a response to the Complaint or otherwise appeared in this action; and

The Clerk of the Court having entered a default against each Defendant on May 16, 2013; and Hypertherm having moved for final default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) and Hypertherm having shown, inter alia, the following:

1. Hypertherm owns all rights, title and interest in and to the Hypertherm Asserted Patents; and

2. Defendants are making, selling, offering to sell, or using products infringing the Hypertherm Asserted Patents in the United States, including this Judicial District; and so the Court:

HEREBY FINDS that each Defendant is liable for patent infringement and this Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order is entered against each Defendant.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, their predecessors, successors, assigns, executors, administrators, and its past, present and future officers, directors, employees, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, partners, attorneys, representatives, shareholders, trustees, agents, advisors and any persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently enjoined and restrained from:

(i) making, selling, offering to sell, or using non-genuine versions of original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents; and
(ii) selling or offering to sell such non-genuine versions of original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents by any means, including at tradeshows and/or using online (internet) resources and services; or
(iii) using the "Made in U.S.A." designation on labels for non-genuine parts that correspond to original Hypertherm parts that are covered by the Hypertherm Asserted Patents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees, subject to plaintiff's timely compliance with Fed.R.Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Rules 54-16.

IT IS FINALL Y ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this litigation for the purposes of interpretation and enforcement of this Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 13, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, v. PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2014)