From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 31, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF

03-31-2014

HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, v. PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE FERENBACH

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 24, 2014.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by March 13, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby awarded $38,821.76 against defendants WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc., jointly and severally.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

__________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 31, 2014
Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Techs. Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:HYPERTHERM, INC., Plaintiff, v. PROFILE CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES LTD., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01952-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 31, 2014)