From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW

10-20-2011

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant.

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP Fred A. Rowley, Jr. Counsel for Rambus Inc. FRED A. ROWLEY, JR. (SBN 192298) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP Theodore G. Brown, III Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH Theodore G. Brown, III (SBN 114672) KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP


Parties listed on signature page

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING WITH REGARD TO HYNIX'S BILL OF COSTS

Judge: Honorable

Ctrm: 6

WHEREAS, Hynix filed its Bill of Costs Pursuant to Fed. Rules App. Proc., Rule 39(e) on May 27, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding Schedule for Briefing with Regard to Hynix's Bill of Costs on June 23, 2011 ("June 23 Order");

WHEREAS, the mandate of the Federal Circuit issued in this case on August 9, 2011;

WHEREAS, Hynix filed a Supplemental Bill of Costs on August 24, 2011;

WHEREAS, Rambus's Objections to Hynix's Bill of Costs and Supplemental Bill of Costs is currently due on September 15, 2011 pursuant to the briefing schedule set forth in the June 23 Order;

WHEREAS, on August 18, 2011 and September 7, 2011, Hynix provided Rambus with certain additional documents related to certain items in its Bill of Costs, including foreign-language documents;

WHEREAS, Hynix has agreed to provide Rambus with English-language translations of the foreign-language documents provided on September 7, 2011 as soon as they become available;

NOW, THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned counsel for Hynix and Rambus, that:

(1) Rambus has through and including September 19, 2011 to file its Objections to Hynix's Bill of Costs and Supplemental Bill of Costs;

(2) Hynix has through and including October 3, 2011 to file papers in response to Rambus's Objections;

(3) Hynix and Rambus have through and including October 3, 2011 to file a statement identifying any cost items or objections that have been withdrawn based upon their meet and confer efforts, and also to identify the cost items that remain in dispute;

(4) The schedule set forth above is subject to modification by Court order, either upon motion from either party demonstrating good cause or on the Court's own initiative, or by agreement of the parties subject to Court approval.

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

Fred A. Rowley, Jr.

Counsel for Rambus Inc.

FRED A. ROWLEY, JR. (SBN 192298)

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

Theodore G. Brown, III

Counsel for Hynix Semiconductor Inc.; Hynix

Semiconductor America Inc.; Hynix Semiconductor

U.K. Ltd.; and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland

GmbH

Theodore G. Brown, III (SBN 114672)

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 00-20905 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)