Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Hynes v. N.H. Democratic Party

175 N.H. 781 (N.H. 2023)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Hynes v. N.H. Democratic Party

3 Citing cases

  1. Richards v. Union Leader Corp. & a.

    2024 N.H. 49 (N.H. 2024)   Cited 4 times
    In Richards v. Union Leader Corp., 324 A.3d 908 (N.H. 2024), the plaintiff claimed that the defendant author's statement accusing the plaintiff of ''disseminat[ing], across multiple media platforms, white supremacist ideology'' was defamatory because the term ''white supremacist'' has an accepted meaning capable of being proven true or false and because the statement implied undisclosed defamatory facts.

    Hynes v. N.H. Democratic Party, 175 N.H. 781, 785 (2023) (quotation omitted). The United States Supreme Court has expressed "a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open."

  2. Richards v. Union Leader Corp.

    324 A.3d 908 (N.H. 2023)

    As we have recently explained, discussion of public issues is "integral to the operation of the system of government established by our Constitution." Hynes v. N.H. Democratic Party, 175 N.H. 781, 785, 302 A.3d 47 (2023) (quotation omitted). The United States Supreme Court has expressed "a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open" Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 85, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966) (quotation omitted).

  3. Attorney Gen. v. Hood

    2025 N.H. 3 (N.H. 2025)

    Resolving this dispute requires us to engage in statutory interpretation, and we review the trial court's statutory interpretation de novo. See Hynes v. N.H. Democratic Party, 175 N.H. 781, 787 (2023). We first look to the language of the statute itself, and, if possible, construe that language according to its plain and ordinary meaning.