From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hynes v. Damico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 8, 1976


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 19, 1975, which, after a jury trial, is in favor of defendant and against him. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No contention has been raised with regard to the sufficiency of the evidence. The trial court erred in charging the jury on the possibility of an emergency situation being present. There were no facts presented at the trial upon which the jury could find that defendant was responding to an emergency situation (see Demme v Elmer J. Fogerty, Inc., 47 A.D.2d 851). Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur; Latham, Acting P.J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.


Summaries of

Hynes v. Damico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Hynes v. Damico

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HYNES, Appellant, v. JOSEPH F. DAMICO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)