From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 1988
139 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Summary

In Hymowitz v Lilly Co. (139 A.D.2d 437, affg 136 Misc.2d 482), this court upheld the revival statute in the face of a constitutional challenge.

Summary of this case from Besser v. Squibb Sons

Opinion

April 14, 1988


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on July 21, 1987, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Ira Gammerman, J., without costs and without disbursements.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Asch, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 1988
139 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

In Hymowitz v Lilly Co. (139 A.D.2d 437, affg 136 Misc.2d 482), this court upheld the revival statute in the face of a constitutional challenge.

Summary of this case from Besser v. Squibb Sons
Case details for

Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Case Details

Full title:MINDY HYMOWITZ, Respondent, v. ELI LILLY COMPANY et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Besser v. Squibb Sons

CPLR 202 provides: "An action based upon a cause of action accruing without the state cannot be commenced…