Summary
adhering to Golding v. United Homes Corp. , 6 Wash. App. 707, 495 P.2d 1040, in which the court had "reaffirmed the general rule stated in Epperly that the owner of premises owes to the servant of the independent contractor employed to perform work on his premises the duty to avoid endangering him by the owner's own negligence or affirmative act, but owes no duty to protect him from the negligence of his own master "
Summary of this case from Golik v. CBS Corp.Opinion
NO. 87247-3
2012-09-06
Appeal From: 29906–6–III, 167 Wash.App. 136, 272 P.3d 889
Petition For Review: Denied.