Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp.

1 Citing case

  1. Winfield v. Corr. Officers Sigala Gonzalez

    23-CV-783 JLS (BGS) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2024)

    Rather, “a court should generally leave a previous decision undisturbed absent a showing that it either represented clear error or would work a manifest injustice.” Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp., 306 F.Supp.2d 958, 968 (S.D. Cal. 2003) (citing Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 817 (1988)). And ultimately, whether to grant or deny a motion for reconsideration is in the “sound discretion” of the district court.