From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. Vinklarek

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 28, 2022
3:22cv6058-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

3:22cv6058-MCR-HTC

09-28-2022

TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE, Plaintiff, v. JEREMIE VINKLAREK, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 20, 2022. ECF No. 14. The Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This matter is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hyde v. Vinklarek

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 28, 2022
3:22cv6058-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Hyde v. Vinklarek

Case Details

Full title:TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE, Plaintiff, v. JEREMIE VINKLAREK, et. al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

3:22cv6058-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Sep. 28, 2022)