From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. Maine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 23, 1975
324 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

Nos. 75-854, 75-858.

December 23, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Jack E. Dadswell, J.

Richard E. Wolverton, of Bradham, Lyle, Skipper Cramer, St. Petersburg, for appellants-petitioners.

Ronald H. Schnell, of Carr Schnell, St. Petersburg, for appellee-respondent.


In this automobile negligence action defendants-appellants seek to appeal a pre-trial order relating to limits of two policies of liability coverage issued by appellant Manchester Insurance and Indemnity Company to defendant-appellant Jerry Wayne Hyde, in which order the trial court "stacked" the limits of each policy. Additionally, in the event the interlocutory appeal has been improvidently taken, appellants have petitioned for common law certiorari to review the same order. Both cases have been consolidated.

This being an action at law, we construe the order appealed from as being a non-appealable interlocutory order. Moreover, concerning the viability of common law certiorari, we think that whether in error or not the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in entering the order nor, if entered erroneously, did appellants suffer irrevocable injury therefrom.

Rule 4.2, F.A.R.

In view whereof, the interlocutory appeal herein should be, and it is hereby, dismissed. Additionally, the petition and prayer for common law certiorari is denied.

McNULTY, C.J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hyde v. Maine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 23, 1975
324 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Hyde v. Maine

Case Details

Full title:JERRY WAYNE HYDE AND THE MANCHESTER INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 23, 1975

Citations

324 So. 2d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Fetters v. United States Fire Ins. Co.

In similar cases such orders have been held to be non-final and non-appealable. Brannon v. Johnston, 83 So.2d…