From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. Chief of Unit Management Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 11, 2012
No. 3:12-0367 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0367

04-11-2012

RONALD WILLIAM HYDE Plaintiff, v. CHIEF OF UNIT MANAGEMENT PERRY, et al. Defendants.


Judge Campbell


ORDER

The Court has before it a pro se prisoner complaint (Docket Entry No.1) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No.2).

It appears from the application that the plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the $350.00 filing fee. Accordingly, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

The plaintiff is herewith ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) and (B), the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account at the institution where he now resides is directed to submit to the Clerk of Court, as an initial partial payment, whichever is greater of: (a) twenty percent (20%) of the average monthly deposits to the plaintiff's inmate trust account; or

(b) twenty percent (20%) of the average monthly balance in the plaintiff's inmate trust account for the prior six (6) months.

Thereafter, the custodian shall submit twenty percent (20%) of the plaintiff's preceding monthly income (or income credited to the plaintiff's trust account for the preceding month), but only when such monthly income exceeds ten dollars ($10.00), until the full filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00) as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) has been paid to the Clerk of Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Consequently, this action is hereby DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

An appeal of the judgment rendered herein would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445-446 (1962). Therefore, the plaintiff is NOT certified to pursue an appeal of this judgment in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

Nevertheless, should the plaintiff decide to file a notice of appeal, he must either pay the Clerk of Court the full appellate filing fee of four hundred fifty five dollars ($455.00) or submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the previous six month period. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Warden of the Metro Davidson County Detention Facility to ensure that the custodian of plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to the payment of the filing fee.

Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this action.

It is so ORDERED.

___________

Todd Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hyde v. Chief of Unit Management Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 11, 2012
No. 3:12-0367 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Hyde v. Chief of Unit Management Perry

Case Details

Full title:RONALD WILLIAM HYDE Plaintiff, v. CHIEF OF UNIT MANAGEMENT PERRY, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0367 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hyde v. Leibach

Ronald William Hyde v. Warden Leibach, et al., Civil Action No. 3:120366 (M.D. Tenn.)(dismissed for failure…

Hyde v. Lashbrook

Furthermore, it appears that Plaintiff was incarcerated in 2012 in the Metro-Davidson County Detention…