From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-1708 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1708

11-03-2021

GILBERT P. HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FORINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendants-Appellees

Andrew M. Grossman, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Mark W. DeLaquil. Peter John Sawert, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Jessica Aber, Thomas W. Krause, Robert J. McManus, Raj Parekh, Michael Tyler.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:18-cv-00546-TSE-MSN, Judge T. S. Ellis, III.

Andrew M. Grossman, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Mark W. DeLaquil.

Peter John Sawert, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Jessica Aber, Thomas W. Krause, Robert J. McManus, Raj Parekh, Michael Tyler.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

(Prost, Reyna, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-1708 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT P. HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-1708 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 3, 2021)