From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyatt v. Lumber Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 29, 1916
103 S.C. 260 (S.C. 1916)

Opinion

9281

February 29, 1916.

Before RICE, J., Dillon, March, 1915. Reversed.

Action by Clarkie Ann Hyatt against Marion County Lumber Company to recover damages for injuries to crops growing on lands in Dillion county, caused by the alleged acts of the defendant in obstructing a watercourse and thereby causing the waters to be backed upon said lands and preventing their natural drainage. From order changing the venue, the plaintiff appeals.

Messrs. Joe P. Lane, L.B. Haselden and J.A. Mace, for appellant.

Mr. M.C. Woods, for respondent.


February 29, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This case was heard in connection with the case of J.B. Pierce, plaintiff-appellant, against Marion County Lumber Company, defendant-respondent, in which the opinion has just been filed. And, as the facts in the two cases are practically the same, the order in the present case is also reversed.


Summaries of

Hyatt v. Lumber Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 29, 1916
103 S.C. 260 (S.C. 1916)
Case details for

Hyatt v. Lumber Company

Case Details

Full title:HYATT v. MARION COUNTY LUMBER CO

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 29, 1916

Citations

103 S.C. 260 (S.C. 1916)
88 S.E. 136

Citing Cases

Rosenblum v. Sun Life Assur. Co.

The evidence does not show where insured died or where the policy was issued or delivered. Johnson v. Mutual…

Ex Parte Martin

The liberty thus guaranteed means, among other things, the right to pursue any lawful business. Smith v.…