From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyatt v. Hyatt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 9, 1983
426 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

In Hyatt v. Hyatt, 426 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), a case directly on point with the instant case, this court initially granted the wife's motion for attorney's fees on appeal using language identical to that of the instant case.

Summary of this case from Pirino v. Pirino

Opinion

No. 82-692.

February 9, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, J. Robert Durden, J.

Richard L. Gumo, Holly Hill, for appellant.

Edward E. Hedstrom, Palatka, for appellee.


In affirming a final judgment of dissolution following an appeal by the former husband, this court granted the former wife's motion for attorney's fees on appeal

Hyatt v. Hyatt, 412 So.2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

". . . conditioned upon a finding by the trial court of need and a commensurate ability to pay after appropriate consideration of the financial resources of both parties. Accordingly, this cause is hereby remanded to the Circuit Court for Volusia County for that consideration, and to assess the amount of the award, if any."

Upon remand, the trial court awarded a fee to the former wife's attorney after hearing testimony on the nature of the services rendered and the reasonable value of the fee. No evidence was presented at all as to the need of the former wife or the ability of the former husband to pay the fee. The former husband appeals and we reverse.

Not only does the order appealed from fail to comply with the order of this court, but it also fails to take into consideration the factors ordinarily considered in determining requests for the award of attorney fees in domestic relations cases, viz, the needs of the requesting spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse to respond. Patterson v. Patterson, 348 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). See also Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

The "Order [on] Wife's Motion for Attorney's Fees" dated April 15, 1982, is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith and with this court's prior order of November 25, 1981.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hyatt v. Hyatt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 9, 1983
426 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

In Hyatt v. Hyatt, 426 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), a case directly on point with the instant case, this court initially granted the wife's motion for attorney's fees on appeal using language identical to that of the instant case.

Summary of this case from Pirino v. Pirino
Case details for

Hyatt v. Hyatt

Case Details

Full title:BILL W. HYATT, APPELLANT, v. IONE S. HYATT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 9, 1983

Citations

426 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Yohanan v. deClaire

In similar circumstances, the fifth district reversed an award of attorney's fees where the testimony at…

Pirino v. Pirino

Accordingly, this cause is hereby remanded to the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida, for that…