From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2014
582 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1606

09-02-2014

RONALD HUGH HUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee.

Ronald Hugh Hutton, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00417-FL) Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Hugh Hutton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Hugh Hutton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, No. 5:13-cv-00417-FL (E.D.N.C. May 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2014
582 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

Case Details

Full title:RONALD HUGH HUTTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 2, 2014

Citations

582 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Hutton v. U.S. Dep't of Veterans Affairs

Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis on January 7, 2015, asserting claims for…

Alford v. Winston-Salem Veterans Affairs

PL's Resp. Opp'n Def.'s Mot. Dismiss [D.E. 20] 3; see Compl. 2. Courts have repeatedly rejected arguments…