From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutto v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
May 16, 2016
190 So. 3d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–38.

05-16-2016

Dennis T. HUTTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Dennis T. Hutto, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Dennis T. Hutto, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charles R. McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Linhares v. State, 36 So.3d 832, 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). A motion to mitigate under rule 3.800(c) is discretionary with the court and is itself not appealable.”).

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS AND RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hutto v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
May 16, 2016
190 So. 3d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Hutto v. State

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS T. HUTTO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

190 So. 3d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)