Hutt v. Lamont's Service, Inc.

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Quality Egg Farm, Inc.

    104 Wis. 2d 506 (Wis. 1981)   Cited 16 times
    Noting that the court considers many factors in concluding that a public nuisance exists

    "`"A nuisance may be merely a right thing in the wrong place, — like a pig in the parlor instead of the barnyard."' Hutt v. Lamont's Service, Inc. (1965), 27 Wis.2d 177, 181, 133 N.W.2d 734." Nevertheless:

  2. Abdella v. Smith

    34 Wis. 2d 393 (Wis. 1967)   Cited 18 times
    In Abdella, after the plaintiff built a drive-in restaurant next to a fifty-horse stable, he sued the stable for nuisance. Seeid. The supreme court concluded, however, that the restaurant was the unreasonable use of the land under the circumstances, not the horse stable.

    "`A nuisance may be merely a right thing in the wrong place, — like a pig in the parlor instead of the barnyard.'" Hutt v. Lamont's Service, Inc. (1965), 27 Wis.2d 177, 181, 133 N.W.2d 734. Nevertheless: