From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huth v. Wells Fargo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 28, 2014
CV 14-7658 PA (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2014)

Opinion


Steven Huth, et al. v. Wells Fargo, et al No. CV 14-7658 PA (SSx) United States District Court, C.D. California October 28, 2014

          Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

          The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

         In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 10, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.


Summaries of

Huth v. Wells Fargo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 28, 2014
CV 14-7658 PA (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Huth v. Wells Fargo

Case Details

Full title:Steven Huth, et al. v. Wells Fargo, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 28, 2014

Citations

CV 14-7658 PA (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2014)