From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Fleischman

United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Sep 7, 2022
Civil Action 22-78 (E.D. La. Sep. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-78

09-07-2022

JUSTIN ANTONIO HUTCHINSON v. DANIEL FLEISCHMAN WARDEN, ST. TAMMANY JAIL, ET AL.


SECTION “A” (4)

ORDER

The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Justin Antonio Hutchinson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against defendants St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Randy Smith, St. Tammany Parish District Attorney Warren Montgomery, St. Tammany Parish Jail Warden Daniel Fleischman, Dr. Jose Ham, and Dr. Samuel Gore are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), § 1915A, and as applicable, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, as frivolous, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, and as to defendant Montgomery, for seeking relief against an immune defendant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hutchinson's state law claims of slander, defamation, malicious prosecution, negligence, and malpractice are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 18) filed by defendants Dr. Ham and Dr. Gore is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Fleischman

United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
Sep 7, 2022
Civil Action 22-78 (E.D. La. Sep. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Fleischman

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN ANTONIO HUTCHINSON v. DANIEL FLEISCHMAN WARDEN, ST. TAMMANY JAIL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-78 (E.D. La. Sep. 7, 2022)

Citing Cases

Reynolds v. Titus Cnty.

Similarly, District Attorneys enjoy absolute prosecutorial immunity from civil suit for damages under § 1983…