From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 6, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1293 MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 6, 2008)

Opinion

ACTION No. 07-1293 MLB.

June 6, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jun 6, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1293 MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jun 6, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 07-1293 MLB (D. Kan. Jun. 6, 2008)

Citing Cases

COX v. ASTRUE

Therefore, the ALJ cannot reject the opinions of Dr. Morris based on speculation that those opinions are…