From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchins v. Sampson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12354 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12354

11-14-2012

FIDEL HUTCHINS, #436852, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA SAMPSON, et al., Defendants.


DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD E. ROSEN


MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION (DKT. NO. 39)

On October 9, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 27). On October 18, 2012, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion by November 9, 2012. (Dkt. No. 34).

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Request for an Extension For: Order Requiring Plaintiff to file a Response." (Dkt. No. 39). Plaintiff says he did not receive the Court's Order until October 29, 2012.

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion, and gives Plaintiff until December 17, 2012 to file a response.

IT IS ORDERED.

______________________

MARK A. RANDON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, November 14, 2012, by electronic and/or first class U.S. mail.

Melody R. Miles

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

Plaintiff also asks the Court to assist in transferring him to another State facility. However, the Court does not have the authority to require the MDOC to transfer Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Hutchins v. Sampson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12354 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Hutchins v. Sampson

Case Details

Full title:FIDEL HUTCHINS, #436852, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA SAMPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-12354 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2012)