From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchins v. Rapid Runner Roadside

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 4, 2023
No. C23-1861-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 4, 2023)

Opinion

C23-1861-RAJ

12-04-2023

CHANNING HUTCHINS, Plaintiff, v. RAPID RUNNER ROADSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MICHELLE L. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. (Dkt. # 1.) Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405.00 filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP (dkt. # 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall note that leave to proceed as a pauper does not necessarily entitle Plaintiff to a waiver of any other cost(s) of litigation.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the Plaintiff and to the Honorable Richard A. Jones.


Summaries of

Hutchins v. Rapid Runner Roadside

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 4, 2023
No. C23-1861-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Hutchins v. Rapid Runner Roadside

Case Details

Full title:CHANNING HUTCHINS, Plaintiff, v. RAPID RUNNER ROADSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 4, 2023

Citations

No. C23-1861-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 4, 2023)