From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchens v. Reynolds

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 1, 2010
4:10CV01077 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 1, 2010)

Opinion

4:10CV01077 BSM/JTR.

September 1, 2010


ORDER


The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections have been received. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommended disposition are approved and adopted in their entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted.

2. Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Dated this 1st day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Hutchens v. Reynolds

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 1, 2010
4:10CV01077 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Hutchens v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:GLENN LEE HUTCHENS ADC #91914 PLAINTIFF v. DAVID L. REYNOLDS, Judge…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Sep 1, 2010

Citations

4:10CV01077 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 1, 2010)