From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchens v. Leo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-1724 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1724 CKD P

10-12-2023

PHILLIP HUTCHENS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN LEO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 28, 2023, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Hutchens v. Leo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 12, 2023
2:23-cv-1724 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Hutchens v. Leo

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP HUTCHENS, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN LEO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1724 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)