From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hussing v. Zuckerman

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Dec 4, 2024
No. 3D24-0023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024)

Opinion

3D24-0023

12-04-2024

Carolina Hussing, et al., Appellants, v. Segal Zuckerman, P.A., Appellee.

AM Law LLC, and Gary M. Murphree, for appellants. Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP, and Richard I. Segal, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 22-18365, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge.

AM Law LLC, and Gary M. Murphree, for appellants.

Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP, and Richard I. Segal, for appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO, and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."); Shojaie v. Gables Pro. Ctr., 974 So.2d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("'It is the responsibility and duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned.'" (quoting Gleim v. Gleim, 176 So.2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965))); see also Portner v. Koppel, 382 So.3d 742, 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (holding that an appellate court reviews factual findings of counsel's authority to settle a case on behalf of a client for substantial, competent evidence).


Summaries of

Hussing v. Zuckerman

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Dec 4, 2024
No. 3D24-0023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Hussing v. Zuckerman

Case Details

Full title:Carolina Hussing, et al., Appellants, v. Segal Zuckerman, P.A., Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Dec 4, 2024

Citations

No. 3D24-0023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024)