Opinion
3:21-cv-655-MOC
11-21-2022
LOTOYA HUSH, Plaintiff, v. SCHWAN'S CONSUMER BRANDS, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN. JR, DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and on Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15). The Court DENIES both motions.
Furthermore, the Court notes that Plaintiff is now represented by counsel.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, Pro se Motion for Entry of Default and for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Strike Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 15), are DENIED.