Opinion
C.A. No. N18C-11-021 MMJ
04-29-2019
On Defendant Kathy Kiernan Newcomb's Motion to Dismiss
GRANTED On Kathy Bullock's Motion to Dismiss
GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART ORDER
Kathy Kiernan Newcomb's Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff has alleged two instances of defamation by Newcomb.
The first is that Newcomb voted to have Plaintiff's daughter removed from a traveling sports team. Plaintiff has not identified any statement or other communication that would fall within the required definition of slander. A vote is not a defamatory statement.
Read v. Carpenter, 1995 WL 945544, at *2 (Del. Super.), aff'd, 670 A.2d 1340 (Del. 1995).
The second instance alleged is defamatory statements about Plaintiff made to the coach of another sports team in an attempt to prevent Plaintiff's daughter from making the team. Oral defamation is not actionable without special damages. Plaintiff has not pled special damages resulting from or proximately caused by these statements.
Id. At *5. --------
The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed two amended complaints. Defendants did not consent to these amendments and no motion to amend was filed. These pleadings were not offered pursuant to the rules of procedure. However, even if the amended complaints had been properly filed, the allegations contained therein do not cure the enumerated deficiencies.
THEREFORE, Kathy Kiernan Newcomb's Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED.
Kathy Bullock's Motion to Dismiss
Bullock's Motion to Dismiss is based solely on the statute of limitations.
Pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 8119, the applicable statute of limitations is two years. The Court finds that any alleged defamatory statements made prior to November 7, 2016 are barred.
THEREFORE, Kathy Bullock's Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4/29/19
/s/_________
The Honorable Mary M. Johnston