holding that the unavailability, absent compulsory process, of a witness would result in "serious injustice," thus was a sufficient factor in granting the forum non conveniens motion
Summary of this case from Kurzke v. Nissan Motor Corp.No. 92-1572.
May 17, 1993, October TERM, 1992.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 982 F. 2d 778.
holding that the unavailability, absent compulsory process, of a witness would result in "serious injustice," thus was a sufficient factor in granting the forum non conveniens motion
Summary of this case from Kurzke v. Nissan Motor Corp.Full title:HURWITZ v. SHER
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 17, 1993
To determine whether a use is "experimental," a question of law, the totality of the circumstances must be…
Kurzke v. Nissan Motor Corp.Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 788 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128, 102 S.Ct.…