From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurwitz v. Meyer

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 23, 1926
10 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 3371.

February 23, 1926.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thompson, Judge.

For opinion below, see 5 F.2d 370.

Thomas C. Egan, John M. Patterson, and Wolf, Patterson, Block Schorr, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Kennard N. Ware, Charles H. Howson, Howson Howson, and Robert T. McCracken, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


On presentation of affidavits and after hearing the parties, the court below granted a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to preserve the status in quo and prevent any further alleged injury to the plaintiff's current business. After due consideration had, we find no ground for convicting the court of error in so doing, as it has, in its opinion, sufficiently vindicated its present action at this stage of the case.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the appellant's cost.


Summaries of

Hurwitz v. Meyer

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 23, 1926
10 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Hurwitz v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:Louis HURWITZ, Trading as United Postcard Supply Company, Appellant, v. J…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 1926

Citations

10 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1926)