From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurtig v. Mattox

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 22, 2017
408 P.3d 492 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 117,544

12-22-2017

Duane HURTIG and Joyce Hurtig, Appellees, v. James D. MATTOX and Sharon M. Mattox, Co-Trustees of the Rosemary A. Mattox Revocable Trust Dated October 25, 2011, Appellants.

Patrick B. Hughes, of Adams Jones Law Firm, P.A., of Wichita, for appellants. H. Douglas Pfalzgraf, of Pfalzgraf Law Office, of Wellington, for appellees.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hurtig v. Mattox

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 22, 2017
408 P.3d 492 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Hurtig v. Mattox

Case Details

Full title:Duane HURTIG and Joyce Hurtig, Appellees, v. James D. MATTOX and Sharon M…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Dec 22, 2017

Citations

408 P.3d 492 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Viron v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

It is a fiction of the law designed to prevent unjust enrichment.”); see also Hurtig v. Mattox, 408 P.3d 492…

RedGuard, LLC v. Boxwell, LLC

The elements of unjust enrichment are: “(1) a benefit conferred upon one person by another; (2) an…