From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurtado v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2016
No. CV 12-7641 PA (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)

Opinion

No. CV 12-7641 PA (FFM)

01-06-2016

GEORGE HURTADO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, SVSP, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and Claims Two through Eighteen of the First Amended Petition are dismissed with prejudice as untimely. DATED: January 6, 2015

/s/_________

PERCY ANDERSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hurtado v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2016
No. CV 12-7641 PA (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Hurtado v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HURTADO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, SVSP, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

No. CV 12-7641 PA (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)