From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurtado v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
Case No. EDCV 11-960 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 11-960 GHK (FFM)

08-03-2011

JUAN M. HURTADO v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm , United States Magistrate Judge

+-----------------------------------------------+ ¦James Munoz ¦ ¦ ¦ +------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +-----------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PROOF OF SERVICE WAS NOT TIMELY FILED

The Court has reviewed its own files and records and notes plaintiff failed to timely submit a Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by July 22, 2011, as required by the Court's Case Management Order.

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this minute order as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Initials of Preparer JM


Summaries of

Hurtado v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
Case No. EDCV 11-960 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Hurtado v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JUAN M. HURTADO v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. EDCV 11-960 GHK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)