From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurt v. Duncan

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 17, 2024
3:24-cv-00002-BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-00002-BSM

12-17-2024

JOSHUA KEITH HURT PLAINTIFF v. GINA DUNCAN Nurse DEFENDANT


ORDER

Having reviewed the record carefully, Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 11] is adopted.

Joshua Hurt's complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a strike for the purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Hurt v. Duncan

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 17, 2024
3:24-cv-00002-BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Hurt v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA KEITH HURT PLAINTIFF v. GINA DUNCAN Nurse DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 17, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-00002-BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2024)