From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 18, 1997
691 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-04426

Opinion filed April 18, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Daniel True Andrews, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Mr. Hurst challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress, having reserved the right to appeal that denial when he pleaded no contest to the charge of possession of cocaine. He also challenges Condition (18) of his probation because it was not orally imposed.

We affirm on the suppression issue but strike Condition (18) of Mr. Hurst's probation. The State offers no objection to the striking of the probation condition, without remand.

We strike probation Condition (18) and otherwise affirm.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 18, 1997
691 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Hurst v. State

Case Details

Full title:WADE QUENTIN HURST, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 18, 1997

Citations

691 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)