From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Sep 26, 1944
56 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. 1944)

Opinion

No. 27,991.

Filed September 26, 1944.

CRIMINAL LAW — Evidence — Confessions — Audit of Records Disclosing Shortage — Corpus Delicti Established. — In a prosecution for embezzlement, testimony of an auditor that an examination of sales records disclosed a shortage unaccounted for by defendant in a certain amount, together with separate admissions and a written confession by defendant made after the shortage was discovered, was sufficient to establish the corpus delicti.

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court; Nat H. Youngblood, Judge.

Jack Wallace Hurst was convicted of embezzlement, and he appealed.

Affirmed.

Theodore Lockyear and Paul Wever, both of Evansville, for appellant.

James A. Emmert, Attorney General, Frank Hamilton, First Assistant Attorney General, and Frank E. Coughlin, Deputy Attorney General, for the State.


Upon an affidavit framed under § 10-1704, Burns' 1942 Replacement, § 2467, Baldwin's 1934, appellant in a trial without a jury was found guilty of embezzlement, fined and sentenced to imprisonment for sixty days in the Indiana State Farm. In this appeal he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. His argument is based upon the premise that the corpus delicti was proved only by extra-judicial confession. This premise is not supported by the record.

Appellant was employed as manager of a filling station. The products sold and the proceeds thereof belonged to his employer. Records of his sales were kept by appellant. An auditor checked these records and testified that they showed a shortage unaccounted for by appellant in the sum of $216.90. This testimony was independent from appellant's three separate admissions and his written confession, all made after the shortage was discovered, and, considered therewith, was sufficient to establish the corpus delicti. Griffiths v. State (1904), 163 Ind. 555, 557, 72 N.E. 563; Hunt v. State (1939), 216 Ind. 171, 23 N.E.2d 681.

Judgment affirmed.

NOTE. — Reported in 56 N.E.2d 493.


Summaries of

Hurst v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Sep 26, 1944
56 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. 1944)
Case details for

Hurst v. State

Case Details

Full title:HURST v. STATE OF INDIANA

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Sep 26, 1944

Citations

56 N.E.2d 493 (Ind. 1944)
56 N.E.2d 493

Citing Cases

Watts v. State

Hunt v. State (1939), 216 Ind. 171, 178, 23 N.E.2d 681; Messel v. State (1911), 176 Ind. 214, 95 N.E. 565.…

Watts v. State

This, considered with the confession, was ample to establish the corpus delicti. Hurst v. State (1944), 222…