From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 17, 2009
276 S.W.3d 905 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91650.

February 17, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Robert S. Cohen, Judge.

Michael D. Hurst, Bowling Green, pro se.

Chris Koster, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.



ORDER

Michael D. Hurst ("movant") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to reopen his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding based on allegations of abandonment of post-conviction counsel. Movant claims post-conviction counsel abandoned him, and therefore, he is entitled to reopen the proceedings.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hurst v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 17, 2009
276 S.W.3d 905 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Hurst v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael D. HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Feb 17, 2009

Citations

276 S.W.3d 905 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Hurst v. State

The motion court denied both motions. Movant appealed from the denial of the second motion, and we affirmed…