From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 12, 2006
Case No. 3:04cv411/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 12, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04cv411/MCR/MD.

April 12, 2006.


ORDER


This cause is before the court upon petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability (docs. 30 31). Petitioner seeks to appeal this court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the petitioner may not take an appeal from the final order denying § 2254 relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b)(1). Such a certificate may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2).

After review of the file, the court concludes that because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and for the reasons set forth in this court's March 14, 2006 order (doc. 28) adopting and incorporating the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on February 9, 2006 (doc. 26), a certificate of appealability will be denied.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall change the docket to reflect that James R. McDonough has been substituted as respondent in this cause.

2. Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability (docs. 30 31) is DENIED and no certificate shall issue.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hurst v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 12, 2006
Case No. 3:04cv411/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Hurst v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:JOEL LEE HURST, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 12, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:04cv411/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 12, 2006)