From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Sep 22, 1989
445 N.W.2d 889 (Neb. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-1064.

Filed September 22, 1989.

Appeal from the District Court for Sarpy County: RONALD E. REAGAN, Judge. Affirmed as modified, and cause remanded with directions.

Patrick Kelly, Sarpy County Attorney, and Anthony C. Nanfito for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

HASTINGS, C.J., BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.


This case presents the same question as Wilson v. Ransom, post p. 427, 446 N.W.2d 6 (1989), which was decided today. For the reasons stated in Wilson v. Ransom, supra, the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to delete all provisions in the order of November 13, 1987, reciting that the order confirming registration of the Washington support order is a judgment in rem. In all other respects, the order confirming registration is affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED, AND CAUSE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.


Summaries of

Hurst v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Sep 22, 1989
445 N.W.2d 889 (Neb. 1989)
Case details for

Hurst v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:MONA J. HURST, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT H. HURST, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Sep 22, 1989

Citations

445 N.W.2d 889 (Neb. 1989)
445 N.W.2d 889