From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1965
24 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

October 18, 1965


In an action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 30, 1964, which denied their application for a general preference; and (2) an order of said court, entered February 19, 1965 upon reconsideration, which adhered to the original determination. Order, entered February 19, 1965 reversed, without costs; plaintiffs' application for a general preference granted; and action remitted to the Trial Term for entry of an appropriate order. Appeal from order, entered September 30, 1964, dismissed; that order has been superseded by the order of February 19, 1965. In view of the extent of the alleged special damages, and the alleged injuries and protracted treatment, all uncontroverted, it is our opinion that denial of plaintiffs' application for a general preference constituted an improvident exercise of discretion. Brennan, Acting P.J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hurst v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1965
24 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Hurst v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE HURST et al., Appellants, v. ALEXANDER HAMILTON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)