From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 24, 2016
No. 6552-16 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 24, 2016)

Opinion

6552-16

10-24-2016

ELIZA HURST, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

L. Paige Marvel, Chief Judge

On September 22, 2016, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that a proper amended petition had not been filed and the filing fee had not been paid. On October 11, 2016, the Court received from petitioner the $60.00 filing fee. However, petitioner did not submit an amended petition. Petitioner is reminded that a petition form is available under the "Forms" tab on the Court's website at www.ustaxcourt.gov.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that petitioner shall, on or before November 15, 2016, submit to the Court an amended petition which sets forth with specificity each error petitioner alleges to have been committed by the Commissioner in the notice of deficiency upon which this case is based, and the facts upon which petitioner relies to support each allegation of error.


Summaries of

Hurst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 24, 2016
No. 6552-16 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Hurst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ELIZA HURST, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 24, 2016

Citations

No. 6552-16 (U.S.T.C. Oct. 24, 2016)