From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Caledonia Haulers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb 17, 2022
970 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 2022)

Opinion

A21-1390

02-17-2022

Joan E. HURST, Respondent, v. CALEDONIA HAULERS, INC. and Cottingham & Butler Claim Services, Inc., Relators.

Kerry Atkinson, Atkinson Gerber Law Office, P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondent. James Connor, Jacob Colling, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relators.


Kerry Atkinson, Atkinson Gerber Law Office, P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondent.

James Connor, Jacob Colling, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 27, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").

BY THE COURT:

/s/

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Hurst v. Caledonia Haulers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb 17, 2022
970 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 2022)
Case details for

Hurst v. Caledonia Haulers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Joan E. HURST, Respondent, v. CALEDONIA HAULERS, INC. and Cottingham …

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

970 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 2022)