From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurse v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2018
Case No. 17-12657 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-12657

05-08-2018

JIMMIE LEE HURSE, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS SMITH, DONALD MONTGOMERY, KRYSTAL DAVIS, DAWN SMITH, KIM HAYGOOD, and VENITA SMITH, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 32) AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This is a civil rights case. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings. See Doc. 20.

On April 9, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that the case be dismissed without prejudice because indicated he longer wishes to pursue the case. (Doc. 32). Neither party has objected to the MJRR and the time for objections has passed.

Accordingly, the MJRR is ADOPTED by the Court. This case is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: 5/8/2018


Summaries of

Hurse v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 8, 2018
Case No. 17-12657 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Hurse v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE LEE HURSE, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS SMITH, DONALD MONTGOMERY, KRYSTAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-12657 (E.D. Mich. May. 8, 2018)