From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurn v. Perry

UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CASE NO. 11-13759 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-13759

12-20-2012

LESLIE HURN, JR., Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.


HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND AN

EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Leslie Hurn Jr.'s Petition for Writ of Habeus Corpus (Doc. 1) and Motion for Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 10). On April 16, 2008, Hurn was convicted of felon in possession of a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. See Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 750.224f, 750.227b. Hurn argues he is entitled to discovery, an evidentiary hearing, and release from prison resulting from ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, delay in arrest, prosecution's mishandling of evidence, and violation of constitutional rights.

The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives who issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on November 20, 2012 denying all of Hurn's requested relief. (Doc. 14). The R&R informed the parties that objections to the R&R must be filed within "fourteen (14) days of service of a copy hereof" and that "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal." (Doc. 14 at 27) (citations omitted). Neither party filed objections.

Because no objections were filed upon the issuance of the R&R, the parties have waived their right to de novo review and appeal. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). In addition, the Court finds no clear error in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge. See Campbell v. United States Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974). Although the Court recognizes the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to deny Petitioner a certificate of appealability, the issue is moot as no objections were filed, effectively eliminating any right to appeal this order. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, DENIES Petitioner's request for a writ of habeus corpus, and DENIES Petitioner's motion for discovery and an evidentiary hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the above date a copy of this Order was served upon the Petitioner via ordinary U.S. Mail, and Counsel for the Respondent , electronically.

Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager


Summaries of

Hurn v. Perry

UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CASE NO. 11-13759 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Hurn v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE HURN, JR., Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.

Court:UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11-13759 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)