From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurlston v. City of Princeton

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 4, 2015
No. 05-14-00574-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00574-CV

02-04-2015

DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant v. CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee


On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown
Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Appellant's brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 14, 2014, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
140574F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013.
Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee CITY OF PRINCETON, TX recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DR. GLEN HURLSTON.


Summaries of

Hurlston v. City of Princeton

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 4, 2015
No. 05-14-00574-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Hurlston v. City of Princeton

Case Details

Full title:DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant v. CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

No. 05-14-00574-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)