From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurlbut v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 7, 2023
3:22-cv-05819-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 7, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05819-TL

03-07-2023

KATYE HURLBUT and DUSTIN HURLBUT, and the marital community comprised thereof, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES; MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, a governmental entity; JANE and JOHN DOES 1-10, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Vanessa R. Waldref United States Attorney for EDWA Joseph P. Derrig Derek T. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys and Special Attorneys Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. §515 United States Attorney's Attorneys for Defendant PFAU, COCHRAN, VERTETIS & AMALA, PLLC Thomas B. Vertetis, Elizabeth P. Calora William T. McClure, FONG LAW OFFICE Eric Fong Attorneys for Plaintiffs


RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

Vanessa R. Waldref

United States Attorney for EDWA

Joseph P. Derrig

Derek T. Taylor,

Assistant United States Attorneys and Special Attorneys Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. §515 United States Attorney's

Attorneys for Defendant

PFAU, COCHRAN, VERTETIS & AMALA, PLLC

Thomas B. Vertetis,

Elizabeth P. Calora

William T. McClure,

FONG LAW OFFICE

Eric Fong

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JOINT STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO ECF No. 13 AND AGREEMENT ON RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE & ORDER

TANA LIN, DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties file this joint status report pursuant to ECF No. 13.

The parties mediated this case with Roy Umlauf on February 28, 2023. The mediation occurred at the offices of Pfau, Cochran, Vertetis, and Amala in Tacoma, Washington. The United States was present with undersigned counsel and Lieutenant Colonel Jennifer McKeel from the Army. Plaintiffs appeared remotely, and their counsel was present in person. The parties were unable to reach a resolution but continue to negotiate a potential settlement.

As negotiations continue, the parties ask the Court to set a Scheduling Conference with the Court which allows sufficient time for the parties to meet and confer pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and file a joint proposed scheduling order, as the case was stayed before this occurred. Additionally, the parties stipulate and agree that Defendants' responsive pleading deadline, whether by answer or motion, should be April 13, 2023, or 14-days after an Amended Complaint, whichever is later.

The parties having stipulated and agreed, it is so ORDERED. Defendants' response to the complaint is due April 13, 2023, or fourteen (14) days after an amended complaint, whichever is later. An order will issue separately as to a scheduling conference.


Summaries of

Hurlbut v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 7, 2023
3:22-cv-05819-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Hurlbut v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KATYE HURLBUT and DUSTIN HURLBUT, and the marital community comprised…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 7, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-05819-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 7, 2023)