From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huricks v. Shopkick, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2015
No. C-14-2464 MMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)

Opinion

No. C-14-2464 MMC

08-11-2015

ZAK HURICKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHOPKICK, INC., Defendant.


ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Court is defendant Shopkick, Inc.'s ("Shopkick") "Motion for Summary Judgment," filed May 1, 2015. Plaintiffs Zak Huricks and Trista Robinson have filed opposition, to which Shopkick has relied. Also, with leave of court, the parties have filed supplemental briefs. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the parties' respective written submissions, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for August 14, 2015.

Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of their Statement of Supplemental Authority and a supporting declaration, each filed July 31, 2015. Nonetheless, the Court has considered those documents. For future reference, plaintiffs are reminded that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court's Standing Orders, parties are required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. --------

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 11, 2015

/s/_________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Huricks v. Shopkick, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2015
No. C-14-2464 MMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Huricks v. Shopkick, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ZAK HURICKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHOPKICK, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 11, 2015

Citations

No. C-14-2464 MMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)