From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurchick v. Falls Twp. Bd. of Supervisors

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 1964
198 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1964)

Opinion

September 13, 1963.

March 17, 1964.

Workmen's Compensation — Termination of compensation agreement — Burden of proof — Evidence — Continuing disability resulting from condition caused by myelogram — Finding that myelogram was performed for reasons unrelated to original injury.

In a workmen's compensation case, in which it appeared that claimant was injured when he fell from a ladder, fracturing the transverse processes of two vertebrae on the right side of the lumbar spine, and a compensation agreement was entered into for total disability; that defendant-carrier filed a termination petition, alleging that claimant's disability had ended; that the Workmen's Compensation Board found that claimant was still suffering from partial disability, but that this continuing partial disability was due to aggravation of a spinal cyst (which had resulted from a congenital defect) precipitated by an exploratory myelogram performed by claimant's physician some eighteen months after the accident for reasons unrelated to claimant's accident, and terminated the agreement; that there was testimony of claimant's physician that the myelogram was performed by him to ascertain the cause of symptoms of which claimant complained, some and perhaps all of which related to the original accident; and that the court below, finding that there was no evidence to support the finding of the board that the operation was performed for reasons unrelated to the accident, and holding that as a general rule a subsequent aggravation or new injury resulting from medical treatment or surgery for the original injury is attributable to the original accident even in cases of mistaken diagnosis, unnecessary operation, and negligence in treatment, set aside the findings and conclusions of the board in part and remanded the record for further proceedings; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Before RHODES, P.J., ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ.

Appeal, No. 192, Oct. T., 1963, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Jan. T., 1961, No. 22, in case of George Hurchick v. Falls Township Board of Supervisors et al. Order affirmed.

Same case in court below: 32 Pa. D. C. 2d 729.

Appeal by claimant from decision of Workmen's Compensation Board refusing award.

Order entered sustaining appeal, vacating findings and remanding record to board for further proceedings, opinion by FULLAM, J. Defendants appealed.

Daniel J. Ryan, with him La Brum and Doak, for appellants.

Harold S. Patton, with him Neal and Patton, for appellee.


Argued September 13, 1963.


The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County reversing the order of the Workmen's Compensation Board and remanding the record to the Workmen's Compensation Board for further proceedings is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge JOHN P. FULLAM, reported at 32 Pa. D. C. 2d 729.

See: Fehr v. Y. M. C. A., 201 Pa. Super. 107, 192 A.2d 143 (1963).


Summaries of

Hurchick v. Falls Twp. Bd. of Supervisors

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 17, 1964
198 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1964)
Case details for

Hurchick v. Falls Twp. Bd. of Supervisors

Case Details

Full title:Hurchick v. Falls Township Board of Supervisors et al., Appellants

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 17, 1964

Citations

198 A.2d 356 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1964)
198 A.2d 356

Citing Cases

Workmen's Comp. Ap. Bd. v. Berger Sons

" The leading case in this area is Hurchick v. Falls Twp. Bd. of Supervisors, 32 Pa. D. C.2d 729, 734-36,…

Parker v. W.C.A.B

"Where claimant in good faith seeks medical treatment for [her] injury and the medical treatment itself…