From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hupp v. Petersen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2016
Case No. ED CV 15-1247-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 15-1247-VAP (SP)

01-06-2016

PAUL HUPP, Plaintiff, v. MARK EDWARD PETERSEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint and this action without leave to amend. DATED: January 6, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hupp v. Petersen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2016
Case No. ED CV 15-1247-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Hupp v. Petersen

Case Details

Full title:PAUL HUPP, Plaintiff, v. MARK EDWARD PETERSEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

Case No. ED CV 15-1247-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2016)