Hupp v. City of Beaumont

Full title: PAUL HUPP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2016

Case No. ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP)

09-02-2016

PAUL HUPP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, et al., Defendants.

HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees, plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions, the other pertinent records in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. // //

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees (docket no. 76) and plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions (docket no. 77) are denied. DATED: Sept 2, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE